Hypocrisy Watch
Debate Ducking (washingtonpost.com)
Mr. Kerry did himself no credit when, like his running mate, he brought up "Dick Cheney's daughter, who is a lesbian," in response to a question about homosexuality. Mr. Cheney has been forthright about his daughter's sexuality, and that's commendable, but it's hard to see why the Democratic ticket should keep bringing it up. Yet unlike Mr. Bush, Mr. Kerry did answer the question, saying he believes homosexuality is an innate characteristic and not a lifestyle choice.
Why does the Post think this did Mr. Kerry no credit? Does it think there is no contradiction in the Bush-Cheney campaign's position on gay rights (i.e. that they should be denied by Constitutional amendment) when a member of the Vice President's family, who is working on his campaign, is gay? Or does the Post perhaps think that Ms. Cheney is somehow being stigmatized when Mr. Kerry brings up her sexual orientation? If the latter, it says more about the Post than Mr. Kerry.
Categories
Law & LibertyThe views expressed on this website are those of the author and webmaster alone (with the exception of links to or quotations from other sources), and do not represent the views of his employer, family, friends, associates or any other person. The author expressly disclaims responsibility for any material to which this site links, any site which links to this site, and any contributions by other persons — including but not limited to links, comments or trackbacks. No statement on this website should be regarded or relied upon as legal or business advice of any kind. Persons seeking legal advice should consult a lawyer licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. This site does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor does reading it, contributing to it, or commenting upon it.

Leave a comment