Bad Law
Congress deserves a pat on the back today for facing down the Bush administration and passing John McCain's unconditional ban on torture, right? Not exactly. Alongside McCain's legislation sits another amendment that undercuts the ban by allowing for the legal use of testimony obtained by torture. If enacted, that provision will move the United States away from standing behind a clear legal and moral principle and into the murk of hedges and exception-making—achieving exactly what McCain's bill is supposed to avoid.
Why is Carl Levin supporting this atrocious amendment?
Categories
Law & Liberty1 Comments
Leave a comment
The views expressed on this website are those of the author and webmaster alone (with the exception of links to or quotations from other sources), and do not represent the views of his employer, family, friends, associates or any other person. The author expressly disclaims responsibility for any material to which this site links, any site which links to this site, and any contributions by other persons — including but not limited to links, comments or trackbacks. No statement on this website should be regarded or relied upon as legal or business advice of any kind. Persons seeking legal advice should consult a lawyer licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. This site does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor does reading it, contributing to it, or commenting upon it.
This is a test.